Rural districts can’t be cities – and never will be

FUN FACT: Recent Norwegian discourse reveals a widespread misconception that even the remotest village deserves every single advantage found, not only in cities, but in the capital itself, while the capital, on the other hand, is worthy of total annihilation.

I’m looking forward to that. Knock yourselves out.

This is, by the way, where I live:

Kattaland Panorama
Whence this blogger hails (shot on a summer day).

How wrong they all are is fairly self-evident, so shan’t try to elaborate, except to ask what they think the point in having a capital may possibly be.

Also (for Norwegian readers):

2 thoughts on “Rural districts can’t be cities – and never will be

  1. I agree – if you choose to live in the country, you’ll gain some things and lose some things, inevitably. I feel that it’s an advantage being far away from medical care, personally (though I might change my mind if ever I’m sick).

    Like

  2. Pingback: Kommunereformen: Altfor få tvangssammenslåelser – Nedtegnelser

Denne bloggen er blottet for intensjoner om interaksjon, men man fremstår jo nødig feig, så kommentarfeltet er åpent. In general comments are not encouraged, as I rarely have the time to engage in discussions, but please feel free, if you so desire.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s